
Nutricost's Value Paradox: Strong Prices on Basics, Uneven Transparency on Testing
Our Verdict
Comprehensive analysis shows a mixed picture: Nutricost is a real Utah-based operation with NSF/ANSI 455 listing (distribution), organic handling certification, recent FDA inspections without warning letters, and competitive pricing on commodity supplements. Independent market tests from NOW Foods validate label accuracy on specific Nutricost SKUs (glutathione, B-12). However, Nutricost does not routinely publish batch COAs, and current lawsuits raise legitimate questions about labeling practices on certain formulas. Bottom line: a value leader for basics if you're comfortable without public COAs; not the transparency standard-bearer or the pick for tested athletes. [1] [2] [4] [5] [6] [11] [12].
How we investigated:Analysis of public certifications and FDA inspection history suggests a legitimate, scaled operation in Utah with NSF/ANSI 455 GMP listing (distribution) and recent FDA inspections but no warning letters. At the same time, consumer reports describe difficulty obtaining COAs, and active class actions challenge labeling on specific formulas. [1] [2] [13] [14] [11] [12].
Ideal For
- Cost-conscious buyers of simple, single-ingredient supplements
- Users comfortable with occasional independent spot-tests instead of posted batch COAs
- Home gym and fitness enthusiasts who don't need sport-certified seals
Avoid If
- You require QR-code/lot-level COAs posted publicly
- You're a tested athlete needing NSF Certified for Sport/Informed Sport
- You prefer brands with robust clinical research on proprietary formulas
Best Products
What to Watch For
Watch the outcomes of pending class actions; monitor whether Nutricost adds QR-code COAs or expands NSF/ANSI 455 coverage beyond distribution; track future NOW Foods market tests for more Nutricost SKUs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Nutricost publish certificates of analysis (COAs)?
As of 2024–2025 we found no routine public COA portal; consumer threads report COAs are generally not provided on request. [13] [14].
Is Nutricost GMP certified?
NSF lists Nutricost Manufacturing as NSF/ANSI 455 GMP (Distribution Facility). That shows audited quality/warehousing operations; it's not equivalent to a product-level seal like NSF Certified for Sport. [1].
Any independent tests on Nutricost products?
Yes. NOW Foods' market testing program found Nutricost Glutathione and Methyl B-12 met or exceeded label claims. [5] [6].
Any recalls or FDA warning letters?
We found no FDA warning letters to Nutricost Manufacturing in the dataset reviewed; the site has received Form 483s historically. [2].
Who owns Nutricost?
eSupplements, LLC (Vineyard, UT) owns the Nutricost trademarks. [8].
Alternatives to Consider
NOW Foods
Runs ongoing third-party market testing; broad line with some USP/NSF participation; often publishes methodology summaries.
Price:Comparable to slightly higher on many basics
Choose when:If you want a brand that actively polices Amazon and posts detailed testing write-ups. [5] [6] [7] [8].
Thorne
Manufacturing rigor and certifications; many practitioner-grade formulas.
Price:Higher
Choose when:Clinical or practitioner-led protocols where tighter controls and published data matter.
Transparent Labs
Label clarity and athlete-friendly positioning; some third-party certifications on sports SKUs.
Price:Higher
Choose when:If you want athlete-oriented products with clearer testing provenance.
BulkSupplements
Low prices on raws; COAs available upon request via portal.
Price:Similar or lower on many commodity powders
Choose when:DIY stackers who want to request COAs directly. [20].
What Customers Say
Polarized experiences: value and efficacy on basics vs. distrust without COAs
Common themes across Reddit threads
"They've been effective for me... but I won't buy from a company who isn't transparent." [13]
"Nutricost CLAIMS third-party testing... but they refuse to prove it." [14]
If you demand posted COAs, you may prefer other brands despite Nutricost's low prices.
Flavor/reformulation complaints on whey
Anecdotal but repeated in 2025 posts
"Reformulated... disgusting... Nutricost refunded me." [19]
Quality on commodities seems solid; sensory changes on flavored proteins may vary by lot.
Independent tests sometimes favorable
Referenced by consumers citing NOW's program
"They do really well in the ConsumerLab/NOW tests." [14]
Select SKUs have third-party corroboration even if COAs aren't posted.
Value Analysis
Pricing Strategy
High-volume, single-ingredient focus keeps per-unit costs low; reliance on commodity raws and house brand distribution. [9] [15].
Ingredient Cost Reality
Use of branded raws like Creapure where it matters (creatine) signals selective premium inputs, not across the board. [9].
Markup Analysis
Creatine example: Nutricost Creapure 1,000 g at $40.97 (~$0.041/g) vs. NOW 500 g at $29.99 (~$0.060/g)—about 32% cheaper per gram. [9] [10].
Excellent value for staples (creatine, glutathione, B-12) with some independent validation; transparency shortfalls and lawsuits temper the premium one should pay.
Key Findings
Verified facility credentials, limited public testing transparency: Nutricost is listed by NSF/ANSI 455 (distribution), holds USDA Organic handling certification, and has been FDA-inspected without warning letters, but it does not routinely publish batch COAs for consumers. [1] [4] [2] [13] [14].
Independent market tests show some strengths: NOW's lab programs reported Nutricost Glutathione at ~114% of label and Methyl B-12 ~107%—a positive sign for those SKUs. [5] [6].
Labeling scrutiny elsewhere: Class actions allege misleading magnesium glycinate claims (capsule size vs. claimed amount) and understated calories/artificial flavor disclosure in certain powders; litigation is ongoing. [11] [12].
Global sourcing with typical industry profile and undisclosed origins: Import/shipping records show Nutricost Manufacturing receiving materials from Asia; country-of-origin isn't routinely disclosed on product pages. [16].
Best Products We Found
Glutathione 500 mg (Nutricost, 240 softgels/caps)
Antioxidant • Generally budget vs. peers; independent test round found ~114% of stated potency.
Strength:Met/exceeded label claim in dual-lab NOW testing (HPLC; NOW + Eurofins/Alkemist).
Weakness:No public batch COA; not NSF Certified for Sport.
Solid value pick for glutathione among mass-market options, with independent spot-verification.
Methyl B-12 5,000 mcg (240 caps)
Vitamin • Aggressively priced megadose B-12; 240-count sizes improve unit cost.
Strength:NOW's Jan 2025 survey reported Nutricost sample at 107% of label. [6].
Weakness:Batch COAs typically not public; B-12 stability and matrix differences can affect testing consistency across labs.
Good price-to-potency on a commodity vitamin; acceptable pick if you don't require posted COAs.
Creatine Monohydrate (Creapure) 1 kg
Sports Nutrition • About $40.97 per 1,000 g (~$0.041/g) vs. NOW 500 g at $29.99 (~$0.060/g). [9] [10].
Strength:Uses Creapure, a reputable German creatine raw material.
Weakness:No sport-certified seal (NSF Certified for Sport/Informed Sport) on most SKUs; flavor iterations of Nutricost whey draw mixed feedback. [17] [19].
Excellent value for athletes who only need basic creatine and don't require sport-certification.
Products to Approach Cautiously
Magnesium Glycinate 420 mg (2-caps serving)
Mineral • Typical for glycinate category
Issue:Allegation that the claimed amount cannot physically fit as described; possible use of different magnesium salt alleged.
Pending litigation; choose brands with posted lot COAs or USP/NSF verification if you want maximum assurance.
EAA Powder & Pre-Workout Powders (selected flavors/batches)
Amino acids / Pre-workout • Budget powdered formulas
Issue:Alleged understated calories (~56 per serving) and undisclosed artificial flavor (DL-malic acid) in a suit against eSupplements/Nutricost.
Labeling dispute unresolved; consider alternatives with published nutrition/methodology or independent certifications.
Red Flags
COA transparency gap
Multiple consumer reports indicate Nutricost no longer shares batch COAs upon request or declines due to 'proprietary' reasons. [13] [14].
Frequency:Recurring reports in 2022–2024 threads
Company Response:Customer service emails reference GMP/ISO-accredited third-party labs but do not attach COAs.
Active labeling litigation
Class actions over magnesium glycinate dosage representation and powdered product calories/flavor disclosure. [11] [12].
Frequency:Filed 2022–2023; status pending
Company Response:Not publicly detailed in sources reviewed
Ingredient origin opacity
Import logs show shipments from Asian ports; routine country-of-origin not posted on product pages. [16].
Frequency:Ongoing industry norm
Company Response:None posted
Expert Perspectives
Garage Gym Reviews notes Nutricost manufactures in NSF-certified facilities but lacks sport-certified seals like NSF Certified for Sport or Informed Sport on most products. [17].
Transparency Issues
Two class actions allege misleading labeling (magnesium glycinate dosage feasibility; calorie/flavor disclosure in powders). Outcomes pending as of September 28, 2025. [11] [12].
Company Background
Ownership:Nutricost is a supplement brand owned by eSupplements, LLC (Vineyard, Utah). Trademark records list eSupplements as the owner; BBB connects related entities (Nutricost, Nutricost Fulfillment). [8] [18] [3].
Founded:The Nutricost word mark shows first use in commerce in 2002; BBB lists Nutricost's business start date as 2017; eSupplements, LLC dates to 2011. [8] [3] [18].
Headquarters:Vineyard, Utah. Facility/addresses commonly referenced: 351 E 1750 N and 277 E 1750 N, Vineyard, UT 84059. [1] [15] [16].
Market Position:Value-focused, wide catalog of mostly single-ingredient products, heavy Amazon and DTC presence. Independent spot-tests from NOW Foods include Nutricost among brands meeting label claims on certain items (glutathione, methyl B-12). [5] [6].
Regulatory Record:Nutricost Manufacturing, LLC shows recent FDA inspections (Sept 2024, Mar 2025) with two historical Form 483s and zero FDA warning letters in the dataset reviewed. [2].
Investigation Methodology
Document review of FDA databases and inspection aggregators, NSF certification directories, trademark and corporate filings, organic certification listings, brand product pages and pricing, trade/shipping records, third-party lab test reports (NOW Foods program), independent reviews, BBB records, and consumer forums. Sources include FDA, NSF, BBB, CCOF, NOW Foods test disclosures, industry trade media, company sites, and logistics databases.
Sources & References
- 1.NSF/ANSI 455 Listing – Nutricost Manufacturing, LLC (Distribution Facility) (2025)[Certification directory] [link]
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.