Tongkat Ali vs Fadogia agrestis
Pick Tongkat Ali if you want an option with human trials, defined dosing, and standardized extracts. Skip Fadogia agrestis for now—there are no human trials and animal toxicity signals raise caution. [1][2][3][5][12][13]
For common goals (supporting low-normal testosterone, stress resilience, libido), Tongkat Ali is the evidence-based choice: multiple RCTs and a meta-analysis show benefits with standardized 100–300 mg/day extracts and acceptable short-term safety. Fadogia agrestis lacks human data and shows organ/testicular toxicity in rats at doses analogous to many marketed servings; until well-controlled human trials establish efficacy and safety, it's not advisable. [1][2][3][4][5][6][12][13]
Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia) Products
Fadogia agrestis Products
The Comparison
A Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)
Standardization: Standardized water extracts used clinically: eurycomanone ~0.8–1.5% and glycosaponins ~40–65% (e.g., Physta/LJ100). [^6][^10]
Dosage: 100–300 mg/day in RCTs; EFSA evaluated up to 200 mg/day as a novel food. [^3][^4][^5][^6]
Benefits
Drawbacks
Safety:Avoid in pregnancy/lactation and hormone-sensitive cancers; caution with liver disease; choose standardized, third-party-tested products. [6][7][8]
B Fadogia agrestis
Standardization: No clinically established standardization; products typically list raw powder or unspecified extracts.
Dosage: No evidence‑based human dosing; animal studies used ~18–100 mg/kg for 1–28 days (not translatable). [^11][^12][^13]
Benefits
- •Aphrodisiac effects and higher serum testosterone seen only in male rats. [11]
Drawbacks
Safety:Given absent human data and animal toxicity signals, many experts advise against routine use. [12][13][14]
Head-to-Head Analysis
Efficacy for primary outcomes (T, libido, vitality) Critical
Winner:Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)• Importance: high
Onset and time‑to‑effect
Winner:Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)• Importance: medium
Side effects/tolerability Critical
Winner:Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)• Importance: high
Standardization/consistency Critical
Winner:Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)• Importance: high
Bioavailability/formulation
Winner:Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)• Importance: medium
Cost/value per effective dose
Winner:Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)• Importance: medium
Which Should You Choose?
Low‑normal testosterone or ADAM‑like symptoms (fatigue, libido)
Choose: Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)
Stress resilience and mood under training/diet/sleep stress
Choose: Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)
Standardized Tongkat Ali lowered cortisol and improved mood states in moderately stressed subjects. [2]
Athletic training support (strength) in middle‑aged adults
Choose: Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia)
Safety Considerations
Tongkat Ali: generally well tolerated in short-to-mid-term trials; rare case reports of liver injury exist—avoid with liver disease and discontinue if jaundice, dark urine, or RUQ pain occur. Not advised in pregnancy/lactation or hormone-sensitive cancers; use standardized, third-party-tested products at studied doses (often 100–200 mg/day). [6][7][8] Fadogia agrestis: no human safety data; rodent studies report adverse testicular changes and hepatonephrotoxicity at moderate–high doses—avoid until robust human trials establish safety. [12][13][14]
Common Questions
What dose of Tongkat Ali is actually studied?
Most RCTs used 100–300 mg/day of standardized water extract for 8–12 weeks; EFSA assessed up to 200 mg/day as a novel food. [3][5][6]
Does Fadogia agrestis raise testosterone in humans?
There are no human trials; increases are limited to rat studies, alongside testicular and organ toxicity signals at higher doses. [11][12][13]
Sources
- 1.Systematic review/meta‑analysis: Eurycoma longifolia improves serum total testosterone in men (2022) [link]
- 2.Tongkat Ali reduces cortisol and improves mood in moderately stressed subjects (JISSN RCT) (2013) [link]
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.EFSA safety opinion on standardized E. longifolia extract (specs, adult dose up to 200 mg/day) (2021) [link]
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.Fadogia agrestis altered testicular function indices; concerning histology at higher doses (2008) [link]
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.In‑vitro human sperm study: therapeutic‑range TA not deleterious; high concentrations harmful (2012) [link]
- 17.