Brand-quality audit Published Jun 30, 2026 Recalibrated Jul 1, 2026

Solgar

A legacy premium vitamin brand with real manufacturing credentials, good formulations, and fair pricing, but weaker batch-level transparency than the best-verified brands.

Composite trust

76 /100 Adequate

Quality

71 /100

Adequate

Formulation

85 /100

Strong

Transparency

76 /100

Adequate

Safety

75 /100

Adequate

Value

80 /100

Strong

Sentiment

72 /100

Adequate

Top strengths

Verified NSF GMP facility certification across a broad U.S. manufacturing network.[^1]
Strong sampled formulations with chelated minerals, high-concentration omega-3, and branded clinically studied ingredients.[^11][^13][^14][^16][^19]
Clear ownership and broad mainstream retail availability through Nestle Health Science and major supplement retailers.[^4][^5][^21][^40]
Generally fair mid-tier to premium pricing for the quality level, especially on basic vitamins and minerals.[^21][^22][^23]

Key concerns

No public batch-level COA portal or lot lookup system was verified.[^2][^3][^10]
No broad Solgar finished-product USP Verification or NSF Certified for Sport product verification was found in the reviewed directories.[^7][^8][^9]
The historical ABC Dophilus contamination and Class I recall remain serious, even with a 25% age discount.[^26][^27][^28]
Some marketing claims have drawn current advocacy scrutiny, especially around menopause symptom claims.[^33]

Badges

NSF certified Third-party tested Effective dosing Premium ingredients Fair value Transparent pricing

Axis by axis

What the evidence shows

Quality

71/100 Adequate

Solgar's manufacturing-quality evidence is above average for a legacy supplement brand because official NSF GMP facility certification is verifiable and the brand discloses in-house manufacturing controls. The main limitation is verification depth: no public batch COA portal was found, ConsumerLab data are limited and partially paywalled, and Solgar's own quality pages do not substitute for batch results. The 2014 ABC Dophilus contamination and recall materially lowers confidence, but the event is old and receives only 25% temporal weight under the rubric.¹²¹⁰²⁶²⁸

Formulation

85/100 Strong

Solgar formulates better than a typical mass-market vitamin brand in the sampled products, mainly because it uses chelated minerals, clinically studied branded ingredients, and meaningful doses in several key categories. The strongest evidence is ingredient-level rather than finished-product clinical trials, so the brand earns credit for science-backed ingredient selection but not for its own product trials. A current TINA letter about menopause claims creates a narrow substantiation concern, but it does not appear to represent the whole catalog.¹³¹⁶¹⁷¹⁹²⁰³³

Transparency

76/100 Adequate

Solgar is reasonably transparent about ownership, contact information, and manufacturing facilities, especially compared with opaque supplement sellers. The biggest transparency gap is test-result access: shoppers can verify NSF GMP facility certification, but they cannot easily verify their own bottle with a batch COA or lot lookup. The 2024 TINA letter is a current claims-transparency concern, though it is an advocacy allegation rather than an FDA or FTC enforcement action.¹³⁴⁵³³

Safety

75/100 Adequate

Solgar's safety record is mixed: the recent public record reviewed does not show a new Solgar-specific recall or FDA warning, but the historical ABC Dophilus event was severe enough to materially affect the score even after the 25% age discount. The 2014 incident involved confirmed fungal contamination and a fatal premature-infant case, while the 2001 salmonella recall is much older and had no illnesses reported in the reviewed article. Current shoppers should not treat those old events as proof that today's products are unsafe, but they do prevent Solgar from receiving a clean-record safety assessment.²⁶²⁷²⁸²⁹³¹

Value

80/100 Strong

Solgar's value is generally fair rather than exceptional. The brand charges more than bargain vitamins, but sampled prices are usually reasonable given NSF GMP facility certification, chelated forms, and branded ingredients. The biggest value limiter is verification: without public COAs or broad finished-product verification, shoppers pay for a legacy quality reputation without batch-level proof.¹⁷¹⁰²¹²³

Sentiment

72/100 Adequate

Solgar's consumer reputation is generally positive but not a clear community-darling profile. High-volume retail ratings for selected products and the brand's long history are positives, while the U.S. Trustpilot page is weak but too small to generalize. Editorially, Solgar does not appear to dominate current 'best brand' lists the way Thorne does in the captured Healthline review.²⁴²⁵³⁶³⁷³⁹

The rubric

How every score was built

Each axis opens at a category baseline, then moves only on dated, cited evidence, never a gut call. That is the whole difference from a star rating: every one of these 31 adjustments is a receipt you can check.

Points	What moved the score
Quality baseline 50 71 Adequate
+14	Verified NSF/ANSI 455-2 GMP facility certification across the NHS U.S. Solgar, Nature's Bounty, Puritan's Pride, Rexall Sundown manufacturing network. The NSF listing is current in the captured record and includes multiple U.S. facilities, including Leonia, NJ, Bohemia, NY, Bayport, NY, Prescott, AZ, Boca Raton, FL, Holbrook, NY, and San Antonio, TX. Rubric range is +10 to +15 for NSF facility certification. Awarding +14 because the certification is official, broad across the manufacturing network, and current, but it is facility GMP certification rather than USP Verified finished products or NSF Certified for Sport finished products. ¹ Current listing reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+6	Solgar discloses in-house manufacturing and quality infrastructure, including small-batch manufacturing, USP water filtration, HEPA air filtration, and avoidance of artificial ingredients or fillers. Rubric supports +3 to +6 for in-house lab or manufacturing quality systems. Awarding +6 because this is a consistent official claim across Solgar and Nestle Health Science pages, but it is not the same as public batch test results. ²⁴ Current official pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+4	Independent product-level testing signal from ConsumerLab. ConsumerLab states that 18 Solgar products were tested and reviewed, but the public page hides the number approved and top picks behind a membership gate. Rubric range is +8 to +12 for disclosed third-party independent testing. Awarding +4 because this is credible independent testing, but it is limited product-level coverage and not a Solgar-run public testing program. ¹⁰ Current ConsumerLab page reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+3	Contaminant-control disclosure for omega-3 products. Solgar states its Triple Strength Omega-3 uses small fish, distillation, and contaminant removal, while Target's product page states the product is molecularly distilled to remove mercury and other harmful contaminants. Rubric range is +3 to +6 for heavy-metal testing or contaminant disclosure. Awarding +3 because this is product-family specific and not batch-level public testing. ¹¹¹² Current product pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
−6	Historical serious contamination incident. In 2014, Solgar voluntarily recalled ABC Dophilus Powder after CDC testing found Rhizopus oryzae in product containers, and CDC described a fatal premature-infant case associated with the contaminated lot. Rubric range is -20 to -30 for contamination incidents. Selected full value -24 for severity, then applied 25% temporal weight because the incident is more than 10 years old: -24 x 25% = -6. ²⁶²⁷²⁸ 2014 incident, more than 10 years old as of July 2026 · 25% weight
—	Not scored No public batch COA portal, batch lookup system, finished-product USP Verification for Solgar, or NSF Certified for Sport Solgar finished product was verified in the reviewed sources. FDA inspection data are also limited by the FDA dashboard's own disclosure caveats.[^7][^8][^9][^32]
Formulation baseline 50 85 Strong
+12	Effective dosing in sampled current products. Reviewed 9 representative Solgar products or product families: Vitamin D3 5000 IU, Magnesium Glycinate 120 mg capsules, Chelated Magnesium with patented Albion chelate, Gentle Iron iron bisglycinate, VM-2000, Triple Strength Omega-3, Joint Ease, Calcium Citrate with D3, and VM-75. Seven of nine had plausible effective dosing, clinically used forms, or clinically positioned ingredient systems. Rubric range is +10 to +15 for effective doses in a majority of the line. Pattern calculation: 7 of 9 sampled products = 78% coverage, so award mid-high +12 rather than full +15. ¹¹¹³¹⁴¹⁵¹⁶²²²⁴ Current product pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+8	Premium and branded ingredient use across sampled products. Examples include Albion chelated minerals in magnesium, Gentle Iron, and VM-2000, TamaFlex and Rhuleave-K in Joint Ease, and NIAGEN NR plus Mitopure Urolithin A in the Cellular Nutrition line. Rubric range is +5 to +8 for branded premium ingredients. Awarding +8 because branded ingredients appear across multiple premium-positioned products rather than a single token SKU. ¹³¹⁴¹⁵¹⁶¹⁷¹⁸¹⁹²⁰ Current product and ingredient pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+8	Bioavailability and delivery technologies. Solgar uses chelated minerals, iron bisglycinate, molecularly distilled fish oils, and branded cellular-health ingredients with published human-research positioning. Rubric range is +8 to +12 for bioavailability technology. Awarding +8 because the evidence is meaningful but not uniformly applied across the entire catalog. ¹¹¹²¹³¹⁴¹⁹²⁰ Current product pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+6	Ingredient-level clinical substantiation in selected newer products. Joint Ease cites a double-blind placebo-controlled TamaFlex trial, the ingredient supplier says TamaFlex is validated in three randomized double-blind placebo-controlled human studies, and Solgar Cellular Nutrition cites RCTs for NR and urolithin A. Rubric range is +5 to +8 for researched synergistic combinations, and +7 to +10 for proprietary formulations with research. Awarding +6 because evidence is ingredient-level and product-family specific, not clinical trials on the finished Solgar products themselves. ¹⁶¹⁷¹⁹²⁰ Current claims and 2023 to 2024 launches, full weight · full weight
+4	Mostly clear active-ingredient labeling in sampled products. The sampled basic products and premium products disclose actives, forms, and serving directions rather than hiding core actives behind broad proprietary blends. Rubric range is +5 to +7 for no proprietary blends, but awarding +4 because this was a sampled review and the full catalog was not exhaustively audited. ¹¹¹³¹⁴¹⁵¹⁶²² Current product pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
−3	Narrow claims-substantiation concern for menopause marketing. Truth in Advertising sent Solgar and Nestle Health Science an October 7, 2024 letter alleging that Solgar's Menopause Relief marketing included symptom-relief claims without the level of substantiation or FDA approval required for treatment claims. This is an advocacy allegation, not an FDA or FTC enforcement finding. Rubric range is -8 to -12 for claims without evidence. Pattern calculation: limited to one product category in a broad catalog, applying 30% of a -10 concern = -3. ³³ October 2024, within last 2 years · full weight
—	Not scored The review sampled representative products rather than every SKU. Finished-product clinical trials on Solgar-branded products were not verified, and some Supplement Facts panels on Solgar's site are difficult to extract completely from the public page rendering.
Transparency baseline 50 76 Adequate
+10	Ownership is clearly disclosed. Solgar is presented as a Nestle Health Science brand, and third-party business reporting documents Nestle's 2021 acquisition of Bountiful brands including Solgar for $5.75 billion. Rubric range is +8 to +12 for ownership fully disclosed. Awarding +10 because parent ownership is easy to verify, though the 2025 strategic review adds some portfolio uncertainty. ⁴⁵⁶ Current ownership page and 2021 to 2025 business reporting · full weight
+8	Manufacturing location and contact transparency. Solgar lists its Leonia, NJ address and contact channels, and the NSF listing gives multiple manufacturing-facility locations under the NHS U.S. Solgar and sister-brand network. Rubric range is +6 to +10 for manufacturing locations disclosed. Awarding +8 because facility addresses are verifiable, though product-by-product facility assignment is not public. ¹³ Current pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+5	Partial ingredient sourcing disclosure. Solgar's fish oil page states fish are sourced from FAO-approved fishing zones and lists small cold-water fish species, while the brand broadly states ingredients come from around the world. Rubric range is +10 to +15 for ingredient sourcing disclosed. Awarding +5 because sourcing detail is useful for omega-3s but not a full supply-chain disclosure across the catalog. ¹¹³⁷ Current product and Trustpilot company information reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+4	Clear labeling and accessible product pages. Product pages reviewed show serving directions, allergen or dietary suitability badges, warnings, and inactive ingredients for many products. Rubric range is +3 to +5 for clear labeling. Awarding +4 because labels are generally clear, but some pages do not expose all amounts cleanly in web text extraction. ¹¹¹³¹⁴¹⁵¹⁶²² Current product pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+2	Customer contact paths include a dedicated quality inquiry category. Solgar's contact form includes 'Quality' and 'Complaint' options. Rubric range is +5 to +8 for responsive inquiries, but no response-time test was performed, so only +2 is awarded for the existence of the pathway. ³ Current page reviewed July 2026 · full weight
−3	Narrow claim-transparency concern from the 2024 TINA letter. TINA alleged Solgar Menopause Relief marketing included symptom-treatment claims lacking adequate substantiation or FDA approval. This is not an agency finding, but it is a current transparency concern about how claims are framed. Rubric range is -10 to -15 for claims that cannot be verified. Pattern calculation: limited category, not catalog-wide, 30% of -10 = -3. ³³ October 2024, within last 2 years · full weight
—	Not scored No direct customer-service COA request was performed for this score. No product-by-product facility assignment, batch COA portal, full supplier map, or comprehensive country-of-origin matrix was found in the reviewed public sources.
Safety baseline 90 75 Adequate
−10	2014 fatal contamination incident involving ABC Dophilus Powder. CDC reported a fatal premature-infant gastrointestinal mucormycosis case and found Rhizopus oryzae contamination in unopened bottles from the same Solgar lot. This fits the rubric's highest severity consumer-harm category. Selected full penalty -40 for consumer harm with death, then applied 25% temporal weight because the incident is more than 10 years old: -40 x 25% = -10. ²⁶²⁷ 2014 incident, more than 10 years old as of July 2026 · 25% weight
−5	2014 voluntary Class I recall for ABC Dophilus Powder. Solgar's recall notice stated the product was found to contain Rhizopus oryzae, distribution was suspended, and consumers were told not to consume it. Rubric range is -12 to -18 for serious voluntary recall. Selected -18 because it was Class I and involved a high-risk population, then applied 25% temporal weight: -18 x 25% = -5. ²⁸ November 2014, more than 10 years old as of July 2026 · 25% weight
−3	2001 suspected salmonella recall of Digestive Aid 100 Tablets. SupplySide reported FDA announced a recall of more than 750 bottles and no illnesses had been reported. Rubric range is -5 to -10 for a minor voluntary recall handled without reported illness. Selected -10 for pathogen seriousness, then applied 25% temporal weight because it is more than 10 years old: -10 x 25% = -3. ²⁹ April 2001, more than 10 years old as of July 2026 · 25% weight
+3	Clean recent public record in reviewed sources. No newer Solgar-specific FDA recall or warning-letter event was verified in the sources reviewed after the 2014 incident. Rubric range is +3 to +6 for a clean 10-year record. Awarding +3, not full +6, because the older ABC Dophilus incident was severe and FDA dashboards have disclosure limitations. ³¹³² No newer Solgar-specific official action verified in reviewed sources through July 2026 · full weight
—	Not scored Court outcomes for historical private lawsuits were not fully verified in primary court records. FDA dashboard data have limitations, and a full FOIA-level inspection-history review was not performed.
Value baseline 50 80 Strong
+10	Market-rate pricing across sampled key products. Vitamin Shoppe listed Solgar Triple Strength Omega-3 at $0.38 per serving, Magnesium Glycinate at $0.28 per serving, Vitamin D3 10000 IU at $0.17 per serving, Vitamin C at $0.17 per serving, and B-Complex 100 at $0.25 per serving. Solgar Vitamin D3 5000 IU was listed separately at $0.18 per serving. Rubric range is +10 to +15 for price matching quality well. Awarding +10 because prices are broadly fair for NSF GMP and premium forms, but not a bargain line. ²¹²² Retail prices reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+5	Comparable value against professional-tier magnesium. Solgar Magnesium Glycinate at $0.28 per serving is close to Vitacost-listed Pure Encapsulations Magnesium Glycinate at $0.25 to $0.30 per serving and Thorne Magnesium Glycinate at $0.29 per serving. Rubric range is +10 to +15 for price matching quality. Awarding +5 as a category-specific value confirmation rather than a full line-wide adjustment. ²¹²³ Retail prices reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+6	Retailers show transparent per-serving pricing and auto-delivery savings. Vitamin Shoppe displays per-serving prices and a 15% auto-delivery savings option on Solgar listings. Rubric range is +6 to +10 for transparent pricing and +8 to +12 for good subscription value. Awarding +6 because pricing transparency is strong at major retailers, but the reviewed evidence is retailer-level rather than Solgar direct subscription terms. ²¹²² Current retailer pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+12	Premium pricing is partly justified by quality and formulation signals. Solgar is not the cheapest brand, but NSF GMP certification, premium chelated forms, branded ingredients, and long-standing retail availability support a modest premium. Rubric range is +12 to +18 for premium justified by quality and certifications. Awarding +12 because the premium is justified in several categories, but lack of public COAs prevents higher value credit. ¹¹³¹⁴¹⁶¹⁹²¹ Current evidence reviewed July 2026 · full weight
−3	Some specialty products are expensive per serving. Vitamin Shoppe listed Solgar No. 7 Joint Support at $0.90 per serving and Extra Strength Glucosamine Chondroitin Complex at $1.04 per serving. Rubric range is -12 to -18 for overpriced products if 20% to 50% above market. Pattern calculation: this concern affected 2 of 10 sampled retail examples, or 20%, and specialty formulas often cost more. Applying limited penalty of -3. ²¹ Retail prices reviewed July 2026 · full weight
—	Not scored Pricing was sampled from major U.S. retail pages and can change with promotions, pack sizes, third-party sellers, and subscription discounts. A full cost-per-effective-dose audit across the entire catalog was not performed.
Sentiment baseline 60 72 Adequate
+6	Large positive product-review signal for selected high-volume products. iHerb listed Solgar Vitamin D3 5000 IU at 4.9 based on 5,458 ratings, while Amazon search results showed substantial recent purchase volume for multiple Solgar D3 products. Rubric range is +8 to +12 for strong Amazon or retail ratings. Awarding +6 because this is strong for selected products but not a catalog-wide review audit. ²⁴²⁵ Current retailer pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+5	UK Trustpilot has meaningful review volume and recent positive product snippets. The UK profile is claimed, shows 618 reviews, and includes recent comments praising products and delivery, though Trustpilot also states it does not fact-check review claims. Rubric range is +10 to +15 for Trustpilot 4.5+ with 200+ reviews, but the captured page did not expose a clear star score. Awarding +5 for volume and mixed-positive signal rather than full high-rating credit. ³⁷ Current Trustpilot page reviewed July 2026 · full weight
−3	US Trustpilot is weak but very low volume. The U.S. Solgar profile shows a 2.4 Poor TrustScore from only 6 reviews and says the company has not invited customers, so reviews may not be representative. Rubric range is -12 to -18 for Trustpilot below 3 stars, scaled down sharply for low sample size. Pattern calculation: 6 reviews is too thin for a broad brand conclusion, applying -3. ³⁶ Current Trustpilot page reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+0	BBB profile is present but not accredited. The BBB search result identifies Solgar Vitamin and Herb in Leonia, NJ and says it is not BBB accredited. Rubric gives +8 to +12 for high BBB rating or -10 to -15 for poor BBB rating. No rating or complaint pattern was captured in the accessible page text, so no rating-based adjustment is applied. Awarding 0 would be below adjustment threshold, so this appears as a notable mention rather than an adjustment. ³⁸ BBB page reviewed July 2026 · full weight
+4	Legacy brand and broad retail presence. Solgar has operated since 1947 and is sold through many health-food stores, independent retailers, pharmacies, and major supplement retailers. Rubric range is +8 to +12 for community favorite in a niche or +12 to +18 for authentic community endorsement. Awarding +4 because legacy retail familiarity is real, but Reddit-style grassroots 'go-to' status was not verified in accessible search results. ²²¹⁴⁰ Current pages reviewed July 2026 · full weight
—	Not scored Reddit and forum evidence was sparse in accessible search results. BBB page text was not fully available through the capture, and Trustpilot ratings can be skewed by self-selection and review-invitation practices.

Best for

Shoppers who want a long-established vitamin brand with verifiable NSF GMP facility certification and broad retail availability.[^1][^21][^40]
People looking for specific Solgar products that use chelated minerals, iron bisglycinate, high-concentration omega-3, or branded ingredients such as TamaFlex, Rhuleave-K, NIAGEN NR, or urolithin A.[^11][^13][^14][^16][^19][^20]
Value-conscious shoppers who want mid-tier to premium formulas at generally fair per-serving prices, especially for commodity vitamins and minerals.[^21][^22][^23]

Skip if

You require public batch-level COAs or lot-specific contaminant and potency reports before buying. No Solgar public COA portal was verified in this review.[^2][^3][^10]
You are a drug-tested athlete who only buys NSF Certified for Sport or Informed Sport finished products. Solgar's reviewed evidence supports NSF GMP facility certification, not NSF Certified for Sport finished-product verification.[^1][^9]
You are buying supplements for premature infants, immunocompromised people, or other high-risk patients without clinician oversight. Solgar's historical ABC Dophilus event makes this a category where medical supervision and product verification matter especially.[^26][^27][^28]

Questions

What shoppers ask about Solgar

Is Solgar a good brand?

Yes, Solgar is a generally good legacy supplement brand if you value NSF GMP facility certification, broad retail availability, and many well-formulated basics and specialty products. The main caveats are that no public batch COA portal was verified and Solgar has a serious but old 2014 contamination history that should be weighed with its age discount.¹¹⁰²⁶²⁸

What is the #1 most trustworthy vitamin company?

There is no single official #1 vitamin company, and the answer depends on what you value: public COAs, USP Verification, NSF Certified for Sport, practitioner use, or price. In the captured 2026 Healthline roundup, Thorne was selected as best overall, while USP's own program explains why the USP Verified Mark is a major trust signal for finished products.⁸³⁹

Are Solgar vitamins FDA approved?

No. Dietary supplements, including Solgar vitamins, are not FDA approved before sale in the way drugs are. FDA says supplement companies are responsible for safety and labeling before marketing, and FDA can take action after adulterated or misbranded products reach the market.³⁰

Is Solgar effective?

Some Solgar products are plausibly effective when they match a real need and are taken at label directions, such as high-dose vitamin D3, chelated minerals, iron bisglycinate, and high-concentration omega-3. The stronger evidence is usually for ingredients and nutrient doses, not finished-product clinical trials on Solgar-branded products.¹¹¹³¹⁴¹⁶¹⁹²⁰

What country is Solgar from?

Solgar is a U.S.-origin brand that presents itself as made in the USA since 1947, with a listed address in Leonia, New Jersey. It is currently part of Nestle Health Science, following the 2021 acquisition of Bountiful brands including Solgar.³⁴⁵⁴⁰

Is Solgar a good vitamin brand?

Solgar is a good vitamin brand for many mainstream shoppers, especially if buying well-priced basics or formulas that use chelated or branded ingredients. It is not the best fit if your standard is public batch COAs, broad USP Verified finished products, or NSF Certified for Sport verification.¹⁷⁸⁹¹³²¹

Sources

1. NSF listing for NHS U.S. Solgar facilities under NSF/ANSI 455-2 GMP (2026)
2. Solgar mission and quality claims (2026)
3. Solgar contact page with Leonia address and quality inquiry category (2026)
4. Nestle Health Science Solgar brand page (2026)
5. Solgar owner sells to Nestle (2021)
6. Nestle considers sale of VMS brands amid strategic refocus (2025)
7. USP Verified Products list (2026)
8. USP Dietary Supplements Verification Program (2026)
9. NSF Certified for Sport program and search resources (2026)
10. ConsumerLab Solgar reviews and testing report card (2026)
11. Solgar Triple Strength Omega-3 product page (2026)
12. Target Solgar Triple Strength Omega-3 product page (2026)
13. Solgar Chelated Magnesium product page (2026)
14. Solgar Gentle Iron product page (2026)
15. Solgar Formula VM-2000 product page (2026)
16. Solgar Joint Ease product page (2026)
17. TamaFlex ingredient clinical evidence page (2026)
18. Rhuleave-K ingredient evidence page (2026)
19. Solgar Cellular Nutrition launch release (2023)
20. ChromaDex NIAGEN partnership with Solgar Cellular Nutrition (2024)
21. Vitamin Shoppe Solgar product and pricing grid (2026)
22. Vitamin Shoppe Solgar Vitamin D3 5000 IU product page (2026)
23. Vitacost magnesium comparison page (2026)
24. iHerb Solgar Vitamin D3 5000 IU product page and ratings (2026)
25. Amazon Solgar Vitamin D3 search results (2026)
26. CDC Health Alert Network advisory on contaminated Solgar ABC Dophilus (2014)
27. CDC MMWR notes from the field on fatal gastrointestinal mucormycosis (2015)
28. Solgar voluntary Class I recall of ABC Dophilus Powder (2014)
29. SupplySide report on 2001 Solgar suspected salmonella recall (2001)
30. FDA dietary supplements overview (2026)
31. FDA recalls dashboard (2026)
32. FDA inspections dashboard (2026)
33. Truth in Advertising letter to Solgar about menopause supplement marketing (2024)
34. Truth in Advertising entry on Nature's Bounty and Solgar biotin supplements class action (2018)
35. Solgar terms of use (2025)
36. Trustpilot U.S. Solgar reviews (2026)
37. Trustpilot UK Solgar reviews (2026)
38. BBB Solgar Vitamin and Herb profile (2026)
39. Healthline 2026 best vitamin brands (2026)
40. Solgar homepage and retail availability statement (2026)

Recalibrated Jul 1, 2026 · 31 scored adjustments · 33 distinct citations across 40 sources